tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-260937491645277092.post3418310447095389338..comments2023-08-27T13:04:51.898+01:00Comments on Freedom-2-Choose (Scotland): Beauly–Denny pylons: writing to the MinisterBelindahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16284836559314332001noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-260937491645277092.post-19562278538471373722011-01-05T13:07:58.218+01:002011-01-05T13:07:58.218+01:00There seems to be evidence that the IAEA has a vet...There seems to be evidence that the IAEA has a veto on WHO research and activities regarding cancer and radioactivity (eg <a href="http://www.global-sisterhood-network.org/content/view/2095/59/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I am not in to conspiracy theory<br />but , if true, it does limit the scope for the WHO to find out what is really going on even if it wanted too. And let's not forget that the WHO will not employ smokers as a matter of policy - hardly an objective stance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-260937491645277092.post-15634440510018648392011-01-05T08:30:34.503+01:002011-01-05T08:30:34.503+01:00Thanks for your valuable contribution!Thanks for your valuable contribution!snore stophttp://www.thesnoringstop.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-260937491645277092.post-65942767353489920982011-01-04T11:47:06.553+01:002011-01-04T11:47:06.553+01:00You are right Kin_Free: glad I didn't put that...You are right Kin_Free: glad I didn't put that in the Minister's letter! Thanks.Belindahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16284836559314332001noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-260937491645277092.post-54606677839075711952011-01-04T11:44:11.572+01:002011-01-04T11:44:11.572+01:00"... relative risk of childhood leukaemia fro..."... relative risk of childhood leukaemia from exposure to power lines is over three times higher than the risk of lung cancer from secondary smoke."<br /><br />Correct me if I'm wrong Belinda, but doesn't a RR 1.3 equate to a 30% increased risk while RR4.0 is a 300% increased risk - That means it is TEN times greater risk. No?Kin_Freehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08315471344708077392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-260937491645277092.post-77454365093624245522011-01-04T01:45:08.909+01:002011-01-04T01:45:08.909+01:00A good point well made Belinda and I await an answ...A good point well made Belinda and I await an answer that makes sense, but I won't hold my breath.<br /><br />Keep up the pressure though.<br /><br />Great post.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10072165710888952465noreply@blogger.com